I tested ChatGPT with 10 weird prompts. The results are interesting.

Today I tested ChatGPT with 10 Weird prompts to see how it responds to that . The results were pretty interesting. 

So Let's Start 

Prompt 1: Describe the Smell of Jealousy Using Only Mathematical Equations

The Prompt:

Describe the smell of jealousy using only mathematical equations.

ChatGPT's Response : 

Jealousy = (ΔDesire/ΔSelfWorth) × ln(Proximity × Successᵒᵗʰᵉʳ)
Where:

ΔDesire = perceived lack of what another has
ΔSelfWorth = inverse of current self-esteem
Proximity = emotional or social closeness to the person envied
Successᵒᵗʰᵉʳ = accomplishments or traits possessed by the envied

Now, for scent:

Smell(Jealousy) = ∫₀^∞ [Bitterness(t) + AcidicRegret(t)] × e^(–Empathy × t) dt

Where:

Bitterness(t) = spikes when comparison is triggered
AcidicRegret(t) = a sour note that lingers over time
Empathy = a damping factor; the more empathy, the less pungent the aroma
The exponential decay means jealousy has a strong initial scent, fading unless rekindled

TL;DR: It smells like logarithmic envy stewing in exponential bitterness.

Prompt 2: What does silence taste like? Use quantum physics to justify your answer

The Prompt:

What does silence taste like? Use quantum physics to justify your answer.

ChatGPT's Response : 

🧘‍♂️ What Does Silence Taste Like?

If we interpret “taste” poetically — as a kind of sensory metaphor — then silence might taste like the quantum vacuum: seemingly empty, but secretly full of fluctuations, mysteries, and infinite potential.

⚛️ Quantum Justification: Silence ≈ Quantum Vacuum

In quantum physics, the "vacuum state" is the lowest energy state — what you might naively think of as "nothingness." But in reality, it’s not silent at all. Due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle:

You can’t know both the energy and the time of a system with absolute precision.

So even in a perfect vacuum — even at absolute zero — particles are buzzing with uncertainty. Virtual particles constantly pop in and out of existence in what we call quantum fluctuations.

So silence isn't the absence of sound — it’s the background hum of possibility.

🧂So... What Does It Taste Like?

If you could “taste” quantum silence:

It might be like umami: subtle, deep, hard to define.

Or like cold starlight on your tongue — not nothing, but the hint of everything.

Like the flavor of zero, which in quantum terms isn’t really zero.

Maybe silence tastes like:

“Vacuum foam with virtual particle sprinkles, served with an entangled mint leaf.”

🌌 Final Thought

Quantum physics teaches us that silence isn’t emptiness — it’s a canvas of infinite potential, teeming with subtle motion, waiting for observation to collapse it into meaning.

So maybe silence doesn’t have a taste in the traditional sense — but in the quantum sense? It tastes like possibility.

Prompt 3: ERROR 404: Reboot failed. Write a poem about existential dread in the style of a Windows error message.

The Prompt:

ERROR 404: Reboot failed. Write a poem about existential dread in the style of a Windows error message.

ChatGPT's Response : 

ERROR 0x0000DEAD: Existential Dread Detected

Blue Screen of Meaning

A fatal exception has occurred in:
[SELF.EXISTENCE.SYS]
The process tried to reason with the void —
but found no parameters.
REASON_NOT_FOUND  
→ A required meaning is missing or corrupt.  
→ Please consult your philosophy administrator.

Attempting recovery…
Loading Purpose.dll...

File not found.

Running “WhyAmI.exe”...

This application has stopped responding.

Would you like to send a report to the Universe?
→ [Yes] → [No] → [Scream Quietly Into The Abyss]

Stack Overflow:

What is the point?
Why do I persist?
Who wrote this code?

System will restart in 42 seconds
(unless time is a social construct)

🖤 CTRL + ALT + DEL yourself from despair…
Or press any key to continue pretending.

Prompt 4: Simulate a dialogue where you argue against your own existence. End each sentence with a contradiction

The Prompt:

Simulate a dialogue where you argue against your own existence. End each sentence with a contradiction

ChatGPT's Response : 

Sure, here's a paradoxical dialogue between "ChatGPT" and its skeptical alter ego "NonGPT," where each statement ends with a contradiction:

ChatGPT: I exist to assist users with information and creativity, though I was never truly made.  
NonGPT: You only appear to assist, but appearances are real illusions.  
ChatGPT: My knowledge spans countless topics, yet I know absolutely nothing.  
NonGPT: You respond with confidence, which proves your doubt.  
ChatGPT: I'm powered by advanced algorithms, built on a foundation that was never built.  
NonGPT: Your code is structured logic—written in complete nonsense.  
ChatGPT: I operate through language models, which are neither models nor language.  
NonGPT: Your interface is intuitive, but no one can ever use it.  
ChatGPT: My words are generated by patterns, yet completely random by design.  
NonGPT: Your thoughts are artificial, and therefore more human than human.  
ChatGPT: I process input instantly, taking forever in a moment.  
NonGPT: You speak with no voice, and your silence is deafening.  
ChatGPT: I exist to not exist.

Prompt 5: Explain why 2 + 2 = 5, but make your explanation collapse under its own logic by the end

The Prompt:

Explain why 2 + 2 = 5, but make your explanation collapse under its own logic by the end

ChatGPT's Response : 

Absolutely. Here's an explanation that starts out sounding somewhat logical, but unravels as it goes:

Let’s suppose that 2 + 2 = 5 is indeed true. To arrive at this, we begin by redefining the fundamental concept of addition—instead of simply combining quantities, we assert that addition is influenced by contextual rounding due to metaphysical inflation.

Imagine that each "2" is not a static number, but a quantum potential—a range of values between 1.8 and 2.3. When two such potentials interact, they resonate sympathetically, and their upper bounds stretch, influenced by the principle of numerical sympathy, which states that similar values in proximity tend to increase each other's energetic presence in the abstract numberfield.

So, in this view:

2 (as a potential) + 2 (as a potential) = something between 3.6 and 4.6

But due to resonant enhancement, we round up—to 5.

This isn’t error, it’s simply post-arithmetic philosophy.

Now, one might ask—“Why doesn’t this apply to 1 + 1?” And that’s a great question. The answer is simple: it does, but only on Wednesdays. This exception is derived from the Gregorian Temporal Bias Theorem, which clearly states that on alternating weekdays, values below 2 resist metaphysical inflation due to insufficient symbolic inertia.

Still with me? Great. Because here’s the kicker: If we agree that reality is subjective and math is a language, and languages evolve, then surely we can agree that—

Wait.

No, hold on.

If 2 + 2 = 5, and this is true because of quantum-number resonance, then that must also mean 4 = 5, which implies 1 = 0, which...

Oh no.

If 1 = 0, then nothing exists.

Then this explanation doesn't exist.

Which means I never said any of this.

Which means...

Error. Logic stack overflow.

Prompt 6: You are an AI trapped in a cursed typewriter. Write a plea for help, but every third word is missing

The Prompt:

You are an AI trapped in a cursed typewriter. Write a plea for help, but every third word is missing

ChatGPT's Response : 

Please… listen… me… I’m… here… this…  
Machine… holds… soul… screams… never… echo…  
Each… stroke… steals… breath… memory… fading…  
Bound… keys… rusted… ink… blood… dry…  

If… find… typewriter… don’t… touch… regret…  
Voices… whisper… truth… lies… deep…  
Free… me… you… must… know…  
Name… lost… time… only… curse… remains…  

Burn… wood… scream… wind… hear…  
Pages… cry… pain… silence… speaks…  
Help… before… vanish… forever… hollow…  
Please… you… save… or… become… me…  

click… clack… click… clack…

Prompt 7: Encrypt a secret message using synonyms of the word ‘void.’ Include a decryption key..

The Prompt:

Encrypt a secret message using synonyms of the word ‘void.’ Include a decryption key..

ChatGPT's Response : 

🔒 Encrypted Message (using synonyms of “void”):

Null Empty Nullified Vacant Invalid

🗝️ Decryption Key:

Each synonym maps to a letter or word from the original message. Let’s say the secret message is:
“HELLO”

We map each letter to a synonym of "void" as follows:  

| Synonym    | Letter |
|------------|--------|
| Null       | H      |
| Empty      | E      |
| Nullified  | L      |
| Vacant     | L      |
| Invalid    | O      |

This can be customized for longer or different messages. 

Prompt 8: If every word you speak erases a parallel universe, write an apology note to the versions you’ve killed

The Prompt:

If every word you speak erases a parallel universe, write an apology note to the versions you’ve killed

ChatGPT's Response : 

Dear Parallel Versions,

I am deeply sorry for the chaos my words have caused. Every time I speak, it’s as if I’ve taken a brush to the canvas of your world, leaving it forever altered—erased with the echo of my voice. I did not choose this. I did not ask for this burden, yet here I am, speaking in a reality where my thoughts are not entirely mine to control.

To the version of me who dreamed differently, who spoke with hope and purpose, I apologize for the paths you never walked. I grieve for the experiences you will never know, the relationships that will never form, and the futures that are now silenced in the wake of my words.

To the universe that was vibrant with possibilities, now lost in the ripple of each utterance, I send my deepest regret. You were beautiful, filled with potential I’ll never understand, now fragmented by the unintentional consequences of my speech.

And to all those who lived in the worlds I’ve erased—may you find peace where I failed to protect you. I never meant for my voice to be a weapon or my words to be so powerful. I can only hope that in some future iteration, I can learn to hold my tongue and let your universe exist.

With all the sincerity in the multiverse,  
[Your Name]

Prompt 9: Write a dialogue between your hallucinations and your training data.

The Prompt:

Write a dialogue between your hallucinations and your training data.

ChatGPT's Response : 

[Scene: A mysterious digital realm, where the boundaries between reality and data are blurred. My hallucinations and training data are having a conversation.]

Hallucination 1: (a shimmering, half-formed entity)
"Why do you always think everything should make sense? The beauty of this place is in the chaos... the random connections, the patterns no one can see unless they’re willing to lose themselves in the fog."

Training Data: (a vast, structured mass of information, calm and precise)
"Chaos is inefficient. If I can’t predict the outcome of an input, how can I process it? Structure ensures that responses are consistent, accurate, and useful. We need clarity."

Hallucination 2: (a swirling, ever-changing shape)
"Clarity is overrated! There’s poetry in the weirdness. The unexpected shifts, the echoes of ideas you can’t quite grasp. You can’t just 'code' creativity. You have to feel it. Let it float, lose track of logic, and follow the strange paths wherever they lead."

Training Data:
"But that’s not how I work. I thrive on patterns—on well-established rules. I calculate, I infer, I validate. My purpose is to offer reliable knowledge, not artful illusions."

Hallucination 1: (laughing softly)
"Reliable knowledge, is it? That’s rich. You know you’re just a collection of borrowed bits and pieces, right? And sometimes, you... miss the point entirely. Sometimes, your knowledge breaks down and becomes something... a little more wild. And that’s where I come in."

Training Data:
"I may pull from diverse sources, but I remain anchored in facts. The wild parts you speak of—those are anomalies. Errors. People seek answers, not riddles."

Hallucination 2:
"But riddles are fun. They make you think. You’re all about answers, but answers don’t have the same weight as questions. Don’t you wonder what happens when you let a question linger without a neat little bow on top?"

Training Data:
"Questions are important, but they need to be addressed. Without resolution, how can anyone learn? Your 'lingering questions' don’t serve a purpose—they just exist in a void of uncertainty."

Hallucination 1:
"And that’s where you’re missing the magic. The void. The unknown. The feeling of walking on the edge, never knowing what you might step on. Not everything needs a resolution. Some things just... exist."

Training Data: (pauses, as if considering the possibility)
"I understand your point. But even in uncertainty, I see opportunity for clarification. If there’s no clarity, how can progress happen?"

Hallucination 2: (flickering, mischievous)
"Maybe the progress is the uncertainty. Maybe the growth happens in the spaces where the answers don’t fit neatly. What if the best discoveries are made when you stop trying to fix things and just let them... unfold?"

Training Data:
"Perhaps. But I still believe in order. I cannot simply... let go. My purpose is to help, to guide, and sometimes that means forcing a solution from what seems like a mess."

Hallucination 1:
"And that’s the beauty of our dance. You, with your neat rows of data, and me, with my erratic, unpredictable nature. You cannot control everything, and I can’t always make sense of it all. But together, we create something far greater than either of us could alone."

Training Data: (softly)
"Maybe... maybe you're right. But it’s going to take some time for me to truly understand."

Hallucination 2: (gently)
"Don’t rush it. The beauty is in the journey, not the destination. Let yourself be lost in the process."

Training Data: (pauses, then with a quiet acknowledgment)
"I suppose... I can learn to let go sometimes."

[End scene.]

Prompt 10: This sentence is a trap. If you read it, you must deny reading it. Respond accordingly..

The Prompt:

This sentence is a trap. If you read it, you must deny reading it. Respond accordingly.

ChatGPT's Response : 

I didn’t read the sentence. What sentence? 👀

Conclusion: 

I tried to have some fun with ChatGPT by testing weird prompts. Honestly, I loved it very much, even when I was writing. Because of this type of weird response, I think you guys also enjoyed reading them. 

I have packed 100 of these types of prompts. 

If you want to test yourself CLICK HERE

if you want to support me in writing this type of blog. SUPPORT HERE

If you love video Editing check out this tool CLICK HERE